He said this could only be considered if the UN Security Council was able to confirm violations of the convention on chemical weapons. "This is a hypothetical situation," he said. Which is clear as the west has not provided the world with any conclusive evidence besides speeches that claim they have proof. The exact same thing happened in Iraq where they pretended that Sadam Hussein had "reconstituted nuclear weapons" and claimed he had "stockpiles of uranium". Russia's support is vital in the UN as they have obviously chose a side which truly defeats the purpose of the 'united nations' when it really means 'only strong nations can be united' it is utter hypocrisy.
A blog which focuses on issues affecting Syria and the Middle east as well as the global international political sphere.
Wednesday, 18 September 2013
UN reports biased and inconclusive!!!!
Russia has come out swinging today, saying that "Without a full picture, we cannot describe the character of the conclusions as anything other than politicised, biased and one-sided," the UN reports that came out a few days ago are inconclusive and one sided, it is clear the inspectors did not go to the area where the government reported chemical attacks. Mr Ryabkov said he assured the Syrian side that there was "no basis" for a UN Security Council resolution on the chemical weapons agreement to invoke Chapter VII of the UN Charter that allows the use of force and tough sanctions.
Lisa.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment